Gunner's Blog

 
Armed Forces News Service

We Support Our Troops!

US Army * US Navy * US Marine Corps * US Coast Guard * US Air Force

News from Our Servicemembers
 
In the Air, On the Front or With the Fleet.

* * AFNS * *
Publishing News About Our Servicemembers since 2003

In the Air
On the Ground
With the Fleet
Please Support Our Troops
US Army      US Navy      US Marine Corps      US Coast Guard      US Air Force 

Main Menu:
Home ] [ Email Troops ] [ Blue Star Families ] [ Video Streaming News Links ] [ Photos Photos ] [ Art ] [ Links ] [ About Us ] [ Link to Us ] [ Privacy ] [ FAQ ] [ Email Bag ] [ Pictures From The Pentagon ] [ Military Humor ] [ Gunner's Blog ]

Military News Feeds by FeedDirect:
Iraq ] [ Mideast ] [ War-on-Terrorism ] [ Breaking Headlines ] [ US Air Force ] [ US Army ] [ US Coast Guard ] [ US Marine Corps ] [ US Navy ] [ National Guard ] [ US DoD ]

Military News Feed by Google Alerts:
Iraq ] [ Mideast ] [ War-on-Terrorism ] [ Breaking Headlines ] [ US Air Force ] [ US Army ] [ US Coast Guard ] [ US Marine Corps ] [ US Navy ] [ National Guard ] [ US DoD ]

Hometown News Releases - News about our Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen, and Coast Guardsmen - By Abbreviation of State of Residence:
AK ] [ AL ] [ AR ] [ AS ] [ AZ ] [ CA ] [ CO ] [ CT ] [ DC ] [ DE ] [ FL ] [ FM ] [ GA ] [ GU ] [ HI ] [ IA ] [ ID ] [ IL ] [ IN ] [ KS ] [ KY ] [ LA ] [ MA ] [ MD ] [ ME ] [ MH ] [ MI ] [ MN ] [ MO ] [ MP ] [ MS ] [ MT ] [ NC ] [ ND ] [ NE ] [ NH ] [ NJ ] [ NM ] [ NV ] [ NY ] [ OH ] [ OK ] [ OR ] [ PA ] [ PR ] [ PW ] [ RI ] [ SC ] [ SD ] [ TN ] [ TX ] [ UT ] [ VA ] [ VI ] [ VT ] [ WA ] [ WI ] [ WV ] [ WY ] [ APO-FPO ] [ Site Map ]

Both US Armed Forces News Service (USAFNS) and Web Independent News Service, L.L.C. are independent organizations, and are not part of, nor endorsed by, any agency of the United States government.
Best viewed with Internet Explorer, Version 4 or later. 1x1.gif
Recommend this page to a friend
Google Custom Search Searches USAFNS.com

users online.
 


Thursday, October 20, 2005

 

CHINFO/FHTNC/USAFNS Debacle - #10 - Summary

This is my final posting in the CHINFO/FHTNC/USAFNS debacle series. I regret that the "whole story" is so long, but CHINFO has presented multiple reasons for withholding the releases from USAFNS.com. I suppose the theory being that "if one throws enough stuff against the wall, some of it will stick."

Point by point, each reason given for withholding FHTNC releases has been addressed, and not one of them hold up to the light of scrutiny by even a casual observer. In my opinion, they have made a decision, and are sticking with it - and have the attitude "I have the power, my mind is made up, don't confuse me with the facts." It reminds me of a boot Third Class Petty Officer that doesn't know how to handle authority, and has to learn how to use it. Or, as is often said on active duty, they are "in over their heads."

One thing to be remembered is that they are not improving the security of our troops by withholding the releases from USAFNS.com. That is because the releases are being distributed to over 10,000 newspapers, most of which have websites, and publish the releases on the web. The internet is an aggregating medium, so, if the information is on the internet, it is available to the world. The net effect of withholding the releases from USAFNS.com is that U.S. Marines, Sailors and Coast Guardsmen are being deprived of the morale boost that comes with seeing their names in print. And, that is one of the primary missions of CHINFO, and the primary mission of FHTNC.

The mission of CHINFO & FHTNC is prescribed by laws that congress has passed, and continue to fund each year. In my opinion, CHINFO & FHTNC are scofflaws and are ignoring the law by withholding the their releases from anyone or any organization that is low abiding and is a U.S. Citizen, or a duly recognized and legitimate taxpaying U.S. business entity. Withholding FHTNC releases from one single website does not make the troops and their families any more secure.

Speaking of scofflaws, the first Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed on 11 September is now 9 working days overdue. Tomorrow will make two weeks overdue. I wonder if they will be a scoff law regarding my FOIA request. On the 25th of October, the second FOIA request that I made will become due. and then on 1 November, the third FOIA request that I made will be due. I think that the probability of them being answered is pretty remote. In my opinion, that will confirm the supposition that CHINFO/FHTNC are scofflaws.

One final opinion - I haven't had anyone come forward with sufficient information to verify the rumor that FHTNC's legacy software system will be cut off next month. I can't verify it, but I believe it to be true. That belief is based upon the NMCI "Reach Back" termination test being conducted this week. The test was announced last month to "validate the expected impact" of the permanent legacy system shutdown. I am 100% confident that the shutdown will occur, but I cannot get a definitive date of the shutdown. I haven't head anything from any of my contacts regarding the problems that are being encountered this week, or if the temporary shutdown has even occurred. I am waiting and watching, and will continue to do so.

~G: This is my final in the Debacle series, but I will make postings as the FOIA saga unravels.

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home


Who links to me?

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


 Prev | List | Random | Next
   Join - Powered by RingSurf!

© 2004-2005 Web Independent News Service, L.L.C. All Rights Reserved.