Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Middle East Imperative
I wrote recently about the war in Iraq and the larger war against radical Islam, eliciting a number of responses. Let me try and put this conflict in proper perspective.
Understand; the current battle we are engaged in is much bigger than just Iraq. What happens in the next year will affect this country and how our kids and grand kids live throughout their lifetime, and beyond. Radical Islam has been attacking the West since the seventh century. They have been defeated in the past and decimated to the point of taking hundreds of years to recover. But they can never be totally defeated. Their birth rates are so far beyond civilized world rates, that in time they recover and attempt to dominate again.
There are eight terror-sponsoring countries that make up the grand threat to the West. Two, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan just need firm pressure from the West to make major reforms. They need to decide who they are really going to support and commit to that support.
That answer is simple. They both will support who they think will hang in there until the end, and win.
We are not sending very good signals in that direction right now, thanks to the Democrats.
The other six, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, North Korea and Libya will require regime change or a major policy shift. Now, let's look more closely.
Afghanistan and Iraq have both had regime changes, but are being fueled by outsiders from Syria and Iran. We have scared Gaddafi's pants off, and he has given up his quest for nuclear weapons, so I don't think Libya is now a threat.
North Korea (the non-Islamic threat) can be handled diplomatically by buying them off. They are starving. That leaves Syria and Iran. Syria is like a frightened puppy. Without the support of Iran they will join the stronger side. So where does that leave us?
Sooner, or later, we are going to be forced to confront Iran, and it better be before they gain nuclear capability.
In 1989 I served as a Command Director inside the Cheyenne Mountain complex located in Colorado Springs, Colorado for almost three years. My job there was to observe (through classified means) every missile shot anywhere in the world and assess if it was a threat to the US or Canada. If any shot was threatening to either nation I had only minutes to advise the President, as he had only minutes to respond.
I watched Iran and Iraq shoot missiles at each other every day, and all day long, for months. They killed hundreds of thousands of their people. Know why? They were fighting for control of the Middle East and that enormous oil supply.
At that time, they were preoccupied with their internal problems and could care less about toppling the west. Oil prices were fairly stable and we could not see an immediate threat.
Well, the worst part of what we have done as a nation in Iraq is to do away with the military capability of one of those nations. Now, Iran has a clear field to dominate the Middle East, since Iraq is no longer a threat to them.
They have turned their attention to the only other threat to their dominance, they are convinced they will win, because the US is so divided, and the Democrats (who now control Congress and may control the Presidency in 2008) have openly said we are pulling out.
Do you have any idea what will happen if the entire Middle East turns their support to Iran, which they will obviously do if we pull out? It is not the price of oil we will have to worry about. Oil WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE to this country at any price. I personally would vote for any presidential candidate who did what JFK did with the space program---declare a goal to bring this country to total energy independence in a decade.
Yes, it is about oil. The economy in this country will totally die if that Middle East supply is cut off right now. It will not be a recession. It will be a depression that will make 1929 look like the 'good-old-days'. The bottom line here is simple. If Iran is forced to fall in line, the fighting in Iraq will end over night, and the nightmare will be over.
One way or another, Iran must be forced to join modern times and the global community. It may mean a real war---if so, now is the time, before we face a nuclear Iran with the capacity to destroy Israel and begin a new ice age.
You may be one of those who believe nothing could ever be terrible enough to support our going to war. If that is the case I should stop here, as that level of thinking approaches mental disability in this day and age. It is right up there with alien abductions and high altitude seeding through government aircraft contrails. I helped produced those contrails for almost 30 years, and I can assure you we were not seeding the atmosphere. The human race is a war-like population, and if a country is not willing to protect itself, it deserves the consequences.
'Enough - said!'
Now, my last comments will get to the nerve. They will be on politics.
I am not a Republican. And, George Bush has made enough mistakes as President to insure my feelings about that for the rest of my life. However, the Democratic Party has moved so far left, they have made me support those farther to the right.
I am a conservative who totally supports the Constitution of this country. The only difference between the United State s and the South American, third world, dictator infested and ever-changing South American governments, is our US Constitution.
This Republic (note I did not say Democracy) is the longest standing the world has ever known, but it is vulnerable. It would take so little to change it through economic upheaval. There was a time when politicians could disagree, but still work together. We are past that time, and that is the initial step toward the downfall of our form of government.
I think that many view Bush-hating as payback time. The Republicans hated the Clinton's and now the Democrats hate Bush.
So, both parties are putting their hate toward willingness to do anything for political dominance to include lying and always taking the opposite stand just for the sake of being opposed. JUST HOW GOOD IS THAT FOR OUR COUNTRY?
In my lifetime, after serving in uniform for President's Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, and Bush I have a pretty good feel for which party supported our military, and what military life was like under each of their terms. And, let me assure you that times were best under the Republicans.
Service under Jimmy Carter was devastating for all branches of the military. And, Ronald Regan was truly a salvation.
You can choose to listen to enriched newscasters, and foolish people like John Murtha (he is no war hero), Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Michael Moore, Jane Fonda, Harry Reid, Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and on-and-on to include the true fools in Hollywood if you like. If you do, your conclusions will be totally wrong.
The reason that I write, appear on radio talk shows, and do everything I can to denounce those people is simple. THEY ARE PUTTING THEIR THIRST FOR POLITICAL POWER AND QUEST FOR VICTORY IN 2008 ABOVE WHAT IS BEST FOR THIS COUNTRY. I cannot abide that.
Pelosi clearly defied the Logan Act by going to Syria, which should have lead to imprisonment of three years and a heavy fine.
Jane Fonda did more to prolong the Vietnam War longer than any other human being (as acknowledged by Ho Chi Minh in his writing before he died). She truly should have been indicted for treason, along with her radical husband, Tom Hayden, and forced to pay the consequences.
This country has started to soften by not enforcing its laws, which is another indication of a Republic about to fall.
All Democrats, along with the Hollywood elite, are sending us headlong into a total defeat in the Middle East, which will finally give Iran total dominance in the region. A lack of oil in the near future will be the final straw that dooms this Republic.
However, if we refuse to let this happen and really get serious about an energy self-sufficiency program, this can be avoided. I am afraid, however, that we are going in the opposite direction.
If we elect( Barack Obama) and a Democrat controlled congress, and they carry through with allowing Iran to take control of the Middle East, continue to refuse development of nuclear energy, refuse to allow drilling for new oil, and continue to do nothing but oppose everything Bush, it will be over in terms of what we view as the good life in the USA.
Now, do I think that all who do not support the war are un-American--- of course not. They just do not understand the importance of total victory in that region.
Another failure of George Bush is his inability to explain to the American people why we are there, and why we MUST win.
By the way, it is not a war. The war was won four years ago. It is martial law that is under attack by Iranian and Syrian outside influences, and there is a difference.
So, what do I believe? What is the bottom line? I will simply say that the Democratic Party has fielded the foulest, power hungry, anti-country, self absorbed group of individuals that I have observed in my lifetime. Our educational system is partially to blame for allowing the mass of America to be taken in by this group. George Bush has done the best he can with the disabilities that he possesses.
A President must communicate with the people. And, I would tell you that Desert Storm spoiled the people. Bush Senior's 100-hour war convinced the people that technology has progressed to the point that wars could be fought with no casualties and won in very short periods of time.
I remember feeling at the time, that this was a tragedy for the US military. To win wars, you must put boots on the ground. When you put boots on the ground, soldiers are going to die. A President must make the war decision wisely, and insure the cause is right before using his last political option.
HOWEVER, CONTROLLING IRAN AND DEMOCRATIZING THE MIDDLE EAST IS THE ONLY CHOICE IF WE ARE HELL-BENT ON DEPENDING ON THEM FOR OUR FUTURE ENERGY NEEDS.
Jimmy L. Cash, Brig. Gen., USAF, Ret. Lakeside, Montana 59922
'I'll tell you what war is all about; you've got to kill people, and when you've killed enough they stop fighting.' Gen. Curtis LeMay
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments Anyone?
~g
Labels: Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Jimmy L. Cash BGen USAF Ret, Libya, Middle East, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
(12.04.2007) Afghan national security forces planned and executed two humanitarian-aid operations in Kandahar province late last month.
3 images
Afghan Doctor, Coalition Forces Save Afghan Baby
(12.04.2007) An Afghan doctor and a coalition forces medic combined efforts to save an 18-month-old Afghan infant from a drug overdose near Cahar Cineh, Oruzgan province, Nov. 30.
2 images
Reserve Commander Delivers Cheer to Afghans
(12.04.2007) The frigid Afghanistan winter was made a little less harsh for Afghan villagers, thanks to thousands of pounds of humanitarian relief supplies delivered by a visiting Air Force leader.
French Ship Guepratte Provides a Presence in Gu...
(12.04.2007) The French frigate Guepratte (F 714) is contributing to security and stability in the Gulf of Aden as part of Combined Task Force 150 by querying vessels, monitoring traffic patterns in the busy waterways, and pr...
Whidbey Island Provides Assistance to Hijacked ...
(12.04.2007) Dock landing ship USS Whidbey Island (LSD 41) provided assistance to the crew of a pirated cargo ship, Dec. 2, ending six weeks the 18 crew members spent as hostages.
Mosul Airport Reopens for Commercial Flights Af...
(12.04.2007) For the first time in 14 years, a commercial airlines flight departed the Mosul Airport Dec. 2, carrying Muslim religious pilgrims on their annual trek to Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
3 images
General Meets With Mentors, Discusses Challenges
(12.04.2007) It’s not every day a commanding general makes himself personally available to discuss troops’ daily challenges. So when Army Brig. Gen. Robert J. Livingston Jr. recently visited Camp Clark, the troops spoke up.
Story by Staff Sgt. Luis P Valdespino Jr.
4 images
Bush Says Iran Still Poses Threat
(12.04.2007) The national intelligence estimate released, Dec. 3, on Iran's nuclear program proves that Iran is still a threat to world peace and provides an opportunity for the international community to work together to per...
Police Reform Aims to Strengthen Afghanistan
(12.04.2007) As this year shapes up to be the bloodiest in Afghanistan since the fall of the Taliban in late 2001, coalition military experts on the ground here are working to help reverse that trend through police reform.
Story by Capt. Bob Everdeen
2 images
Soldiers Help Burned Iraqi Girl
(12.04.2007) The day after treating 307 local residents at a coordinated medical engagement in Al Buaytha, U.S. Army medics were back on the job again at Patrol Base Murray, treating a 5-year-old girl for burns on her legs, D...
Story by Sgt. Kevin Stabinsky
1 images
Police Reform Aims to Strengthen Afghanistan
(12.04.2007) As this year shapes up to be the bloodiest in Afghanistan since the fall of the Taliban in late 2001, coalition military experts on the ground are working to help reverse that trend through police reform.
Story by Capt. Bob Everdeen
2 images
Iraq Transition Assistance Office Visits Narhwa...
(12.04.2007) Mark Tokala, the director of the Iraq transition assistance office, visited the recently-opened health clinic in Narhwan, Dec. 3.
Story by Spc. Ben Hutto
3 images
Gates Lauds Progress in Afghanistan's Khowst Pr...
(12.04.2007) Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates visited Afghanistan's Khowst province today to see firsthand "a model of concerted counterinsurgency effort, the synergy that comes from an integration of 'hard' and 'soft' power...
Story by Donna Miles
4 images
Coalition, Iraqi Forces Make Gains Against Al-Q...
(12.04.2007) While the fight in Iraq remains tough, coalition and Iraqi forces have made significant gains against al-Qaida recently, a U.S. military spokesman there said today.
Gates: Intelligence Estimate Shows Need to Keep...
(12.04.2007) Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates today pointed to the new national intelligence estimate as evidence that non-military means are the best way for the United States to deal with Iran's nuclear enrichment program....
Story by Donna Miles
Labels: ANSF, Burned Iraqi Girl, Cahar Cineh, French frigate Guepratte (F 714), Iran, Khowst province, LSD 41, Mosul Airport, Narhwan, National Intelligence Estimate
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
SILENCE IN SYRIA, PANIC IN IRAN

Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
Wednesday, 19 September 2007
One of India's top ranking generals assigned to liaise with the Iranian military recently returned to New Delhi from several days in Tehran - in a state of complete amazement.
"Everyone in the government and military can only talk of one thing," he reports. "No matter who I talked to, all they could do was ask me, over and over again, 'Do you think the Americans will attack us?' 'When will the Americans attack us?' 'Will the Americans attack us in a joint operation with the Israelis?' How massive will the attack be?' on and on, endlessly. The Iranians are in a state of total panic."
And that was before September 6. Since then, it's panic-squared in Tehran. The mullahs are freaking out in fear. Why? Because of the silence in Syria.
On September 6, Israeli Air Force F-15 and F-16s conducted a devastating attack on targets deep inside Syria near the city of Dayr az-Zawr. Israel's military censors have muzzled the Israeli media, enforcing an extraordinary silence about the identity of the targets. Massive speculation in the world press has followed, such as Brett Stephens' Osirak II? in yesterday's (9/18) Wall St. Journal.
Stephens and most everyone else have missed the real story. It is not Israel's silence that "speaks volumes" as he claims, but Syria's. Why would the Syrian government be so tight-lipped about an act of war perpetrated on their soil?
The first half of the answer lies in this story that appeared in the Israeli media last month (8/13): Syria's Antiaircraft System Most Advanced In World. Syria has gone on a profligate buying spree, spending vast sums on Russian systems, "considered the cutting edge in aircraft interception technology."
Syria now "possesses the most crowded antiaircraft system in the world," with "more than 200 antiaircraft batteries of different types," some of which are so new that they have been installed in Syria "before being introduced into Russian operation service."
While you're digesting that, take a look at the map of Syria: (see above)
Notice how far away Dayr az-Zawr is from Israel. An F15/16 attack there is not a tiptoe across the border, but a deep, deep penetration of Syrian airspace. And guess what happened with the Russian super-hyper-sophisticated cutting edge antiaircraft missile batteries when that penetration took place on September 6th.
Nothing.
El blanko. Silence. The systems didn't even light up, gave no indication whatever of any detection of enemy aircraft invading Syrian airspace, zip, zero, nada. The Israelis (with a little techie assistance from us) blinded the Russkie antiaircraft systems so completely the Syrians didn't even know they were blinded.
Now you see why the Syrians have been scared speechless. They thought they were protected - at enormous expense - only to discover they are defenseless. As in naked.
Thus the Great Iranian Freak-Out - for this means Iran is just as nakedly defenseless as Syria. I can tell you that there are a lot of folks in the Kirya (IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv) and the Pentagon right now who are really enjoying the mullahs' predicament. Let's face it: scaring the terror masters in Tehran out of their wits is fun.
It's so much fun, in fact, that an attack destroying Iran's nuclear facilities and the Revolutionary Guard command/control centers has been delayed, so that France (under new management) can get in on the fun too.
On Sunday (9/16), Sarkozy's foreign minister Bernard Kouchner announced that "France should prepare for the possibility of war over Iran's nuclear program."
All of this has caused Tehran to respond with maniacal threats. On Monday (9/17), a government website proclaimed that "600 Shihab-3 missiles" will be fired at targets in Israel in response to an attack upon Iran by the US/Israel. This was followed by Iranian deputy air force chief Gen. Mohammad Alavi announcing today (9/19) that "we will attack their (Israeli) territory with our fighter bombers as a response to any attack."
A sure sign of panic is to make a threat that everyone knows is a bluff. So our and Tel Aviv's response to Iranian bluster is a thank-you-for-sharing yawn and a laugh. Few things rattle the mullahs' cages more than a yawn and a laugh.
Yet no matter how much fun this sport with the mullahs is, it is also deadly serious. The pressure build-up on Iran is getting enormous. Something is going to blow and soon. The hope is that the blow-up will be internal, that the regime will implode from within.
But make no mistake: an all-out full regime take-out air assault upon Iran is coming if that hope doesn't materialize within the next 60 to 90 days. The Sept. 6 attack on Syria was the shot across Iran's bow.
So - what was attacked near Dayr az-Zawr? It's possible it was North Korean "nuclear material" recently shipped to Syria, i.e., stuff to make radioactively "dirty" warheads, but nothing to make a real nuke with as the Norks don't have real nukes (see Why North Korea's Nuke Test Is Such Good News, October 2006).
Another possibility is it was to take out a stockpile of long-range Zilzal surface-to-surface missiles recently shipped from Iran for an attack on Israel.
A third is it was a hit on the stockpile of Saddam's chemical/bio weapons snuck out of Iraq and into Syria for safekeeping before the US invasion of April 2003.
But the identity of the target is not the story - for the primary point of the attack was not to destroy that target. It was to shut down Syria's Russian air defense system during the attack. Doing so made the attack an incredible success.
Syria is shamed and silent. Iran is freaking out in panic. Defenseless enemies are fun.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I had made a mental note that it was odd that Syria didn't go into very loud sabre rattling after the Israli raid into the middle of the country. I recall when we bombed Kadafi's palace, and there wasn't a sound out of him. I remember it well, France wouldn't allow our bombers to fly through their airspace. So, we simply flew around France - it took another refuelling or two to make the round trip, but we did it. Unfortunately, our intel was incorrect, and he wasn't in that palace that night.
Obviously, there is no way to know whether Dr. Wheeler's conclusions are corrrect, but it sure makes interesting reading.
This was published Sept 19, 2007 on Dr. Wheeler's website TTP (http://www.tothepointnews.com/). Since then, it has been published on several other blogs. His website make some very interesting points, and is thought provoking. Check it out! Labels: bluff, F-15, F-16 Dayr az-Zawr, France, Iran, Israel, Panic, Syria, Tehran
~g
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
George S Patton's New Speech-Iraq & modern world
Labels: America, Clinton, Freedom, George Bush, imitation, impression, Iran, Iraq, Jihad, Parody, Patton, War, World
Wednesday, August 08, 2007
IRAQ News Alerts by Google - 08/08/07
Power Line - Minneapolis,MN,USA
The US, he insisted, should never pull out until we have real security in the form of an Iraqi military in control of the situation, something the British ...
See all stories on this topic
NYT's Baghdad Bureau Chief: 'No Doubt' Surge Making Life Better in ...
NewsBusters - USA
But Burns also thinks "there's no doubt" things are better in Iraq since the troop surge and that a withdrawal would make life "very much worse" there. ...
See all stories on this topic
Iraqi Leader Talks Security in Iran
Forbes - NY,USA
The Iraqi prime minister's visit to Tehran came two days after US and Iranian experts held talks in Baghdad on improving Iraq's security. ...
See all stories on this topic
Would It Take A Dictator to Stabilize Iraq?
IraqSlogger - USA
The re-emergence of a nationalist dictator could provide Iraq its best hope for stability, according to a number of scenarios proposed by a workshop held by ...
See all stories on this topic
Helping enemies in Iraq
Cincinnati Post - OH,USA
The Defense Department has no clue about what happened to at least 190000 guns - 110000 AK47s and 80000 pistols - that it gave Iraqi security forces in 2004 ...
See all stories on this topic
Iraq Says LUKoil Will Get a Fair Shake
The Moscow Times - Russia"Any rules are better than no rules at all." Analysts said it was not clear, however, to what extent the Iraqi government would welcome investment from ...
See all stories on this topic
Maliki arrives in Iran as US bombs Sadr City
Daily Star - Lebanon - Beirut,LebanonMaliki's visit comes two days after Iraqi, Iranian and US officials held the first meeting of a committee aimed at improving cooperation on stabilizing Iraq ...
See all stories on this topic
Debate on Iraq surge's effectiveness heats up
Christian Science Monitor - Boston,MA,USA
For now, things look much better than before. American advisers told us that many of the corrupt and sectarian Iraqi commanders who once infested the force ...
See all stories on this topic
Labels: Iran, Iraq, Iraq Surge Effectiveness, LUKoil, Maliki, Sadr City, Security, Surge Making Life Better
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
IRAQ Google News Alerts - 06/19/07
Raw Story - Cambridge,MA,USA
The new US ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, has urged Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to send more, better qualified staff to the biggest US embassy ...
See all stories on this topic
Moqtada al-Sadr Stepping into the Power Vacuum
Global Terrorism Analysis - Washington,DC,USA
Saving them, bringing them closer together and using them in the service of Iraq are better than excluding and marginalizing them" (al-Iraqiyah, June 7). ...
See all stories on this topic
Success in Iraq Determined at 'Macro Level,' Enlisted Leader Says
Media Newswire (press release) - New York,NY,USA
For the second measure, Hill said, "you can define winning by improving the life of the Iraqi people and bringing some form of normalcy back" to them. ...
See all stories on this topic
Iran is America's best hope for stability in the Gulf
Financial Times - London,England,UK
By Selig Harrison Iran is ready to help the US stabilise both Iraq and Afghanistan, but only for a price: a gradual accommodation between Washington and ...
See all stories on this topic
Richardson wants "zero troops" in Iraq
MSNBC - USA
"There is not a single sign that Iraq is improving," Richardson said. "...How many more Americans must die before we leave an Iraq that will be no better off ...
See all stories on this topic
DISPATCH FROM IRAQ Training The Future 1744th Transportation ...
MyWebTimes.com - Ottawa,IL,USA
Regardless, all of their attitudes have changed for the better." Spc. Michael Kaminky, of Ottawa, has developed a better understanding of what it takes to ...
See all stories on this topic
FEATURE-Misery in the desert for Iraq's dispossessed
Reuters AlertNet - London,England,UK
Similar camps are scattered around the mainly Shi'ite south of Iraq, where security conditions have been markedly better than in Baghdad and the surrounding ...
See all stories on this topic
Labels: "Zero Troops", 1744 Transportation, Iran, Misery in the desert, Moqtada al-Sadr, Shi'ite
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Standoff Over Britons Held in Iran Escalates
LONDON, March 28 Britain's dispute with Iran over 15 captured sailors and marines escalated sharply today when Britain froze all "bilateral business" with Tehran and Iran displayed some British prisoners on state television an act condemned by the Foreign Office here as "completely unacceptable."
One of the captured sailors, Faye Turney, 26, the only woman among them, was shown wearing a black head-scarf and saying "obviously we trespassed into their waters." She also praised her captors as "very friendly, very hospitable and very thoughtful, nice people. They explained to us why we had been arrested."
Iran's foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, attending a meeting in Saudi Arabia, had indicated earlier that Ms. Turney could be released soon. "There was no hurt or harm," Ms. Turney said in the television footage. "They were very, very compassionate."
Iranian authorities also made public what they said was a letter written Thursday by Ms. Turney to her family saying: "We were out in the boats when we were arrested by Iranian forces as we had apparently gone into Iranian waters. I wish we hadn't because then I would be home with you all right now. I'm so sorry we did because I know we wouldn't be here now if we hadn't. I want you all to know that I am well and safe.
"I am being well looked after, I am fed three meals a day and I'm in constant supply of fluids," the letter said. Her words were addressed in part to her three-year-old daughter Molly and husband Adam.
The circumstances in which she recorded her words and wrote the letter were not clear. Some of the captured Britons were shown in a room eating a meal with her, but it was also not clear the extent to which the tape had been edited. In one section she was wearing a black and white checkered head-dress and in another a black head scarf.
After the video tape was broadcast, Margaret Beckett, the British Foreign Secretary, said that she was concerned about "any indication of pressure on, or coercion of, our personnel."
British officials have been denied access to the captured sailors and their whereabouts were not disclosed. Britain renewed its demand on Thursday for the release of its sailors.
Ms. Turney's remarks contradicted insistence in London that the British sailors had been in Iraqi waters where they patrol under Iraqi and United Nations auspices to interdict smugglers and protect oil installations.
Earlier Prime Minister Tony Blair told parliament that the British sailors, captured on March 23, were acting legally and in Iraqi waters.
"It is now time to ratchet up international and diplomatic pressure in order to make sure that the Iranian government understands their total isolation on this issue," he told parliament.
The Royal Navy also took the highly unusual step of making public charts, photographs and previously secret navigational coordinates purportedly proving that the British sailors were 1.7 nautical miles - roughly 1.95 miles on land - inside Iraqi waters when they were apprehended at gun-point and forced into Iranian waters.
The toughened British posture heightened the sense of crisis that has sent oil prices soaring.
The Royal Navy's disclosures opened a coordinated diplomatic barrage by some of the most senior British officials, including Mr. Blair and Mrs. Beckett, the Foreign Secretary, who told parliament that Britain would "be imposing a freeze on all other official bilateral business with Iran until the situation is resolved."
"The Iranian authorities have so far failed to meet any of our demands or responded to our desire to resolve this issue quickly and quietly, through behind the scenes diplomacy," Mrs. Beckett said, explaining Britain's decision to go public and offer some kind of retaliation, if only symbolic.
The government had been under political pressure at home to show itself as more muscular after being accused in newspaper editorials of being timid toward Iran. At the same time, though, many analysts said Mr. Blair had embarked on a risky strategy that could backfire if Iran responded to pressure by digging in its heels and refusing to free its captives.
The decision by Iranian television to show footage of the 15 captives rekindled memories of a similar episode in 2004 when eight other British captives were paraded blindfolded on Iranian television.
Britain has little direct official bilateral business with Iran beyond sporting and cultural ties and some humanitarian assistance to refugees and earthquake victims, according to an assessment on the Foreign Office website (http://www.fco.gov.uk/).
Prince Charles, the heir to the throne, visited Iran in 2004 to show concern after the Bam earthquake.
Britain's more significant diplomatic and political business with Iran is conducted as part of a troika of European nations along with France and Germany pressing Iran to limit its nuclear ambitions.
While the impact of the prohibition on official business was, therefore, unclear, it seemed to reflect the first formal reprisal by Britain in response to the seizure of its personnel, designed to show, in Mrs. Beckett's words to parliament, "the seriousness with which we regard these events."
"This is not going as far as breaking off diplomatic relations," said Lord Norman Lamont, the head of the British-Iranian Chamber of Commerce, "but it is upping the ante." In parliament, the government's actions received support from a broad consensus across party lines.
The publication of the British data followed a warning by Mr. Blair on Thursday that the dispute would enter a "different phase" if the sailors were not released. In parliament on Wednesday the Prime Minister called the seizure of the British personnel "completely unacceptable, wrong and illegal" and renewed calls for their immediate return.
Vice Admiral Charles Style told a news briefing that British authorities "unambiguously contest" Iranian assertions that the sailors were in Iranian waters. He also accused Iranian forces of ambushing the British naval personnel seven Royal Marines and eight sailors. Vice Admiral Style did not offer to answer questions.
He said that, in secret diplomatic contacts, Iran had produced two conflicting sets of coordinates to bolster its case, the first placing the British soldiers in Iraqi waters where, Britain says, they were on a routine anti-smuggling patrol authorized by the United Nations and the Iraqi government.
An Iranian statement said Tehran had "sufficient evidence" to prove that the British sailors had penetrated 0.5 kilometers roughly 500 yards into Iranian waters.
Vice Admiral Style said the British boarding party in two inflatable boats had boarded an Indian-flagged naval vessel on March 23 after observing it unloading cars. He said the boarding took place at these coordinates: 29 degrees 50.36 minutes North, 04 degrees 43.08 minutes east. That placed it 1.7 nautical miles inside Iraqi waters, he said.
In diplomatic contacts last week, he added, Iran had provided Britain with an initial set of coordinates for the position of the boats that placed the incident in Iraqi waters.
"We pointed this out to them on Sunday in diplomatic contacts," Vice Admiral Style said. "After we did this they then provided a second set of coordinates that places the incident in Iranian waters" over two nautical miles away from where they were said to be by Britain, he said.
"It is hard to understand a legitimate reason for this change of coordinates," he said. The Navy said the sailors in two boats had formed a boarding party from H.M.S. Cornwall, a frigate patrolling in Iraqi waters.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It appears that the Iranian's are going to keep pushing to start a shooting war with the US & the Brits. If they don't stop this nonsense and keep pushing and does start a war, we will be forced to finish it.
I saw a great statement on the Patriot Files Forum that proposed that the Brits sink an Iranian Naval Warship each day until the 15 sailors and Marines are returned to British Authorities. I have a better idea, sink two a day!
It appears that Pres. Ahmadinejad is hiding behind a claim that the sailors were taken by a rogue element. Even if that is true, it is he and his governments job to correct the situation. Whether the Iranian Navy did the dirty deed or not is not relevant. I think that they truly believe that they can get away with it. Maybe, but only if they are returned unharmed, VERY SOON!
~G
Labels: British Navy, Foreign Secretary Beckett, HMS Cornwall, Iran, Iranian, Marines, Mottaki, Royal Navy, Sailors, Tony Blair, Turney
Charlie
<< Home

